Aggressive driving in Arizona isn't just a minor traffic violation; it's a class 1 misdemeanor. This means it's a criminal charge, which can result in a permanent mark on one's criminal record. Unlike standard traffic citations, which are often seen as infractions with associated fines, aggressive driving is dealt with in the criminal justice system. This record is accessible to employers, housing agencies, and others during background checks.

‍

Here is a detailed breakdown of Arizona's aggressive driving penalties:

‍

• Potential Jail Time: Convicts can face up to 6 months in jail.

‍

• Probation: Probation periods can extend to as long as three years. The terms of probation may encompass regular check-ins, travel restrictions, and other court-mandated stipulations.

‍

• Fines: Fines can reach a steep $4,575, and that's before considering possible court fees and other related costs.

‍

• Driver's License Suspension: Those convicted could find their driving rights restricted or even completely revoked, which can significantly impact their daily lives and careers.

‍

• Driver License Points: Convicts receive 8 M.V.D. points on their license. Collecting points can lead to license suspension if the driver exceeds more than 13 points over a rolling 12-month period. Additionally, you may be required to attend traffic survival school and learn defense of driving techniques.

‍

• Insurance Repercussions: Such convictions paint drivers as high-risk in the eyes of insurance companies, potentially leading to a spike in premium rates. In extreme cases, or if there are other blemishes on one's driving record, insurance providers might choose to cancel the existing policy or deny coverage upon renewal.

‍

Aggressive Driving Defense Strategies

‍

When charged with aggressive driving, understanding the nuances of potential defenses can be the difference between conviction and acquittal. Let's explore these defenses in greater detail:

‍

1. Lack of Evidence: The Prosecution is responsible for demonstrating that the defendant's actions met the criteria for aggressive driving. This often hinges on the quality and clarity of evidence presented. An attorney might question the angle or quality of traffic camera footage. The reliability of eyewitness testimonies—were they in a position to accurately see the incident? Could their perception have been affected by factors like stress or weather conditions?

‍

2. Necessity: This defense acknowledges the aggressive action but asserts that it was unavoidable due to external factors. For instance, swerving across lanes might have been necessary to dodge debris or an animal. The attorney would need to provide evidence supporting this claim.

‍

3. Faulty Equipment: Claims based on technical readings can be disputed by demonstrating irregular maintenance or calibration of equipment like speed guns. Highlighting instances of similar equipment errors in other cases.

‍

4. Incorrect Interpretation of Law: This hinges on the attorney's deep understanding of traffic regulations. The defense would aim to demonstrate that the officer's interpretation doesn't align with the actual legal definitions or precedents.